Applications

JS1000 Mixer Solutions: Comparison of HZS50 and HZS60 Mixing Plants

I. Core Analysis of JS1000 Mixer Station Configuration  

As the core host of small and medium-sized commercial concrete plants, the JS1000 mixer has a single mixing capacity of 1 cubic meter. Its supporting mixing plant models are primarily determined by the efficiency of the feeding system. According to international standard classifications, the JS1000 is mainly paired with two models:  

• Hopper-type feeding system: Forms a standard HZS50 concrete mixing plant with a theoretical productivity of 50 m³/h.  

• Belt-type feeding system: Forms an efficient HZS60 concrete mixing plant with a theoretical productivity of 60 m³/h.  

This classification reflects the design philosophy of the concrete production equipment industry: "Same host, efficiency depends on the supporting system."  

II. Detailed Comparative Analysis of Technical Parameters

 III. In-depth Analysis of Feeding System Efficiency Mechanisms  

 3.1 Efficiency Bottlenecks of Hopper-Type Feeding  

The HZS50 mixing plant uses a wire rope hoist system with inherent efficiency limitations:  

Operation Cycle Analysis:

- Hopper loading time: 15-20 seconds  

- Hoisting operation time: 10-15 seconds (speed: 0.8-1.2 m/s)  

- Discharging time: 10 seconds  

- Return descent time: 10-15 seconds  

- Total cycle time: 70-90 seconds  

Key Efficiency Loss Points:

- Mandatory waiting time accounts for 30%-40%  

- Energy loss due to acceleration/deceleration  

- Unutilized return time during empty operation  

- Intermittent operation mode causes production fluctuations  

 3.2 Efficiency Advantages of Belt-Type Feeding  

The HZS60 mixing plant’s belt conveyor system achieves revolutionary efficiency improvements:  

Continuous Feeding Mechanism:

- Belt conveyor ensures continuous material transport  

- Aggregates are pre-transported to the buffer hopper above the mixer  

- The mixer operates without waiting for materials, enabling continuous production  

- The buffer hopper acts as a "reservoir," balancing production efficiency  

Key Technological Breakthroughs:

- Waiting hopper design: 4 m³ capacity ensures continuous feeding  

- Constant speed operation: Reduces energy loss from frequent starts and stops  

- Automated control: Precisely matches feeding and mixing times  

- Easy maintenance: Belt systems have lower failure rates than hoist systems  

IV. Investment Decision and Selection Guide  

4.1 Applicable Scenarios Analysis  

Situations for Choosing HZS50 Mixing Plant (Approx. 65% of Cases):

- Daily concrete demand below 300 m³  

- Limited project budget, initial investment controlled at 300,000-400,000 RMB  

- Project duration shorter than 12 months  

- Limited installation space at the construction site  

- Low production frequency requirements, intermittent production mode  

Situations for Choosing HZS60 Mixing Plant (Approx. 35% of Cases):

- Daily concrete demand exceeds 300 m³  

- Long-term continuous production projects, annual output exceeding 20,000 m³  

- Sufficient site space for belt conveyor installation (length ≥ 45 meters)  

- High requirements for production stability and efficiency  

- Short payback period required for investment  

4.2 Investment Return Analysis  

Cost Difference Analysis:

- HZS60 equipment investment is approximately 14286--28571 $ higher than HZS50  

- Includes: Belt conveyor system, buffer hopper, reinforced structure  

Payback Period Calculation:

Assuming a net profit of 4.29 $ per cubic meter of concrete:  

- Daily production advantage: HZS60 produces 50-70 m³ more per day than HZS50  

- Daily revenue increase: 214--300$/day  

- Investment payback period: 28571$ ÷ 257$/day ≈ 111 days (approx. 4 months)  

Long-Term Operational Benefits:

- Annual production increase benefit: Approximately 64286$ (calculated based on 250 working days)  

- Energy consumption reduction: Belt system saves 15%-20% energy compared to hoist system  

- Labor cost reduction: Higher automation reduces 1-2 operators  

 V. Technical Upgrade and Retrofit Solutions  

Existing HZS50 mixing plant users can improve production efficiency through technical upgrades:  

Upgrade Option 1: Basic Retrofit

- Install belt conveyor to replace the hopper  

- Add a 4 m³ aggregate buffer hopper  

- Modify the electrical control system to match the new feeding method  

- Investment cost:11429--17143$ 

Upgrade Option 2: Comprehensive Upgrade

- Replace with professional HZS60 batching system  

- Upgrade the mixer host transmission system  

- Optimize control system algorithms  

- Investment cost:8571-14286 $

Upgrade Effects:

- Production efficiency increased by 10%  

- Energy consumption reduced  

- Equipment reliability significantly improved  

 VI. Professional Selection Recommendations  

Based on data analysis from hundreds of customer cases, we recommend:  

Output-Oriented Choice:If your monthly production demand exceeds 8,000 m³, the HZS60 mixing plant is the ideal choice, as its efficiency advantages directly translate into economic benefits.  

Investment-Cautious Choice:If the initial budget is limited or the project duration is short, the HZS50 offers a cost-effective solution that can be upgraded as business grows.  

Sustainable Development Choice:Considering equipment residual value, the HZS60 mixing plant retains 10%-15% higher residual value after 3 years due to its technological advancedness.  

 Get a Free Personalized Solution:

Provide your specific requirements (aggregate type, daily output requirements, site size, investment budget), and Tongxin Machinery's technical team will customize an optimized concrete mixing plant configuration plan for you, including complete solutions such as equipment selection, site planning, and return on investment analysis.